Japan vs Japan — 1992 vs 1999
| Lancer Evolution Evolution III (CE9A) | Lancer Evolution VI TME | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 270 hp | 280 hp |
| Torque | 228 lb-ft | — |
| Engine Size | 1,997 cc | 1,997 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0 sec | — |
| Top Speed | 149 mph | — |
| ¼ Mile | 13.5 sec | — |
| Wheelbase | 2,510 mm | 2,510 mm |
| Length | 4,310 mm | 4,350 mm |
| Units Produced | 5,000 | 2,500 |
| Value (Excellent) | $75,000 | $90,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 10/10 |
This matchup is remarkably close. The 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution III (CE9A) offers its unique character, while the 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI TME counters with its own distinct appeal. Neither holds a decisive advantage, making this a true enthusiast's dilemma. Your choice ultimately depends on which driving philosophy resonates more with you.
The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution lineage tells a fascinating story of automotive evolution. Comparing the 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution III (CE9A) with the 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI TME reveals how Mitsubishi refined and reimagined one of its most important nameplates over the years. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution III (CE9A) producing 270 hp and the 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI TME delivering 280 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution uses a Inline-4 DOHC 16V Turbocharged displacing 1,997 cc, while the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution relies on a Inline-4 with 1,997 cc. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.