Czechoslovakia vs Czech Republic — 1984 vs 2019
| Rapid 136 Coupe | Kodiaq RS 2.0 TSI 245 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 58 hp | 245 hp |
| Torque | 71 lb-ft | 273 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,289 cc | 1,984 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 14.5 sec | 6.5 sec |
| Top Speed | 94 mph | 145 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 19.5 sec | 14.8 sec |
| Weight | 2,061 lbs | 3,844 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,400 mm | 2,791 mm |
| Length | 4,200 mm | 4,699 mm |
| Original MSRP | — | $50,000 |
| Value (Excellent) | $15,000 | $50,000 |
| Collectibility | 4/10 | 2/10 |
| Rarity | 6/10 | 4/10 |
Two outstanding machines, each with compelling strengths. The 1984 Skoda Rapid 136 Coupe excels in lighter weight, stronger collectibility, better value, while the 2019 Skoda Kodiaq RS 2.0 TSI 245 stands out for more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The best advice? Drive both if you can, then follow your instincts.
The 1984 Skoda Rapid 136 Coupe and 2019 Skoda Kodiaq RS 2.0 TSI 245 share a manufacturer in Skoda, but that's where the similarities get interesting. These two models reveal the versatility and ambition of the Skoda brand. The 2019 Skoda Kodiaq RS 2.0 TSI 245 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 245 hp compared to 58 hp, a 187-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Skoda Rapid 136 uses a I4 OHV displacing 1,289 cc, while the Skoda Kodiaq RS relies on a I4 DOHC Turbo with 1,984 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2019 Skoda Kodiaq RS 2.0 TSI 245 edges ahead at 6.5 seconds versus 14.5 seconds. The Skoda Rapid 136 carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 1783 lbs lighter. On the collector market, the 2019 Skoda Kodiaq RS 2.0 TSI 245 commands a significant premium over the 1984 Skoda Rapid 136 Coupe, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1984 Skoda Rapid 136 Coupe rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.