Mitsubishi FTO

vs

Honda CR-X

Japan vs Japan — 1994 vs 1989

Mitsubishi FTO (1994)
Honda CR-X (1989)
Specifications
FTO GPX MivecCR-X SiR
Horsepower200 hp160 hp
Torque148 lb-ft111 lb-ft
Engine Size1,998 cc1,595 cc
0-60 mph6.5 sec7.1 sec
Top Speed143 mph130 mph
¼ Mile15.0 sec15.3 sec
Weight2,579 lbs2,072 lbs
Wheelbase2,500 mm2,250 mm
Length4,320 mm3,675 mm
Units Produced65,000
Value (Excellent)$22,000$35,000
Collectibility7/108/10
Rarity7/107/10
The Verdict

The 1994 Mitsubishi FTO GPX Mivec holds an edge across most measurable criteria, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. That said, the 1989 Honda CR-X SiR brings lighter weight, stronger collectibility and remains a compelling choice for enthusiasts who value Honda heritage. The right pick depends on whether you prioritize specifications or the intangible qualities that make a car truly special.

Overview

Among Sports Coupe enthusiasts, the matchup between the 1994 Mitsubishi FTO GPX Mivec and 1989 Honda CR-X SiR is one for the ages. These Modern classic machines competed directly for buyers' attention and continue to vie for collectors' affections today. The 1994 Mitsubishi FTO GPX Mivec holds a clear advantage in raw power with 200 hp compared to 160 hp, a 40-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mitsubishi FTO uses a V6 DOHC MIVEC displacing 1,998 cc, while the Honda CR-X relies on a Inline-4 DOHC VTEC with 1,595 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1994 Mitsubishi FTO GPX Mivec edges ahead at 6.5 seconds versus 7.1 seconds. The Honda CR-X carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 507 lbs lighter. On the collector market, the 1989 Honda CR-X SiR commands a significant premium over the 1994 Mitsubishi FTO GPX Mivec, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.