Austin-Healey 3000 MkIII

vs

Honda S600

United Kingdom vs Japan — 1967 vs 1964

Austin-Healey 3000 MkIII (1967)
Honda S600 (1964)
Specifications
3000 MkIII Phase 2S600 Roadster
Horsepower150 hp57 hp
Torque178 lb-ft38 lb-ft
Engine Size2,912 cc606 cc
0-60 mph9.8 sec13.4 sec
Top Speed120 mph90 mph
¼ Mile17.3 sec18.9 sec
Weight2,509 lbs1,532 lbs
Wheelbase2,337 mm2,000 mm
Length3,962 mm3,300 mm
Units Produced17,71213,084
Original MSRP$3,595$1,595
Value (Excellent)$95,000$90,000
Collectibility9/108/10
Rarity7/107/10
The Verdict

The 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 MkIII Phase 2 holds an edge across most measurable criteria, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. That said, the 1964 Honda S600 Roadster brings lighter weight, better value and remains a compelling choice for enthusiasts who value Honda heritage. The right pick depends on whether you prioritize specifications or the intangible qualities that make a car truly special.

Overview

Putting the 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 MkIII Phase 2 against the 1964 Honda S600 Roadster is a comparison that enthusiasts have debated for decades. Each car reflects distinct design philosophies shaped by different automotive cultures — United Kingdom versus Japan. The 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 MkIII Phase 2 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 150 hp compared to 57 hp, a 93-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Austin-Healey 3000 MkIII uses a Inline-6 OHV displacing 2,912 cc, while the Honda S600 relies on a Inline-4 DOHC with 606 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 MkIII Phase 2 edges ahead at 9.8 seconds versus 13.4 seconds. The Honda S600 carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 977 lbs lighter. Whether you prioritize driving dynamics, heritage, or aesthetic appeal, both contenders make a strong case for themselves.