Japan vs Japan — 1992 vs 1997
| Lancer Evolution Evolution III (CE9A) | Pajero Evolution | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 270 hp | 280 hp |
| Torque | 228 lb-ft | 257 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,997 cc | 3,497 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0 sec | 6.5 sec |
| Top Speed | 149 mph | 124 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.5 sec | 15.0 sec |
| Weight | — | 4,145 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,510 mm | 2,545 mm |
| Length | 4,310 mm | 4,310 mm |
| Units Produced | 5,000 | 2,500 |
| Value (Excellent) | $75,000 | $65,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 8/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 9/10 |
This matchup is remarkably close. The 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution III (CE9A) offers quicker acceleration, higher top speed, while the 1997 Mitsubishi Pajero Evolution counters with stronger collectibility. Neither holds a decisive advantage, making this a true enthusiast's dilemma. Your choice ultimately depends on which driving philosophy resonates more with you.
Within the Mitsubishi stable, the 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution III (CE9A) and 1997 Mitsubishi Pajero Evolution represent different approaches to performance and purpose. Both carry the Mitsubishi badge, yet each carves out its own distinct identity. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution III (CE9A) producing 270 hp and the 1997 Mitsubishi Pajero Evolution delivering 280 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution uses a Inline-4 DOHC 16V Turbocharged displacing 1,997 cc, while the Mitsubishi Pajero relies on a V6 DOHC 24V with 3,497 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution III (CE9A) edges ahead at 5.0 seconds versus 6.5 seconds. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1997 Mitsubishi Pajero Evolution rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.