USA vs USA — 2016 vs 1982
| Camaro ZL1 1LE | Camaro Z28 Cross-Fire Injection | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 650 hp | 165 hp |
| Torque | 650 lb-ft | 250 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 6,162 cc | 5,031 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 3.4 sec | 8.6 sec |
| Top Speed | 198 mph | 115 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 11.4 sec | 16.5 sec |
| Weight | — | 3,400 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,811 mm | 2,565 mm |
| Length | 4,784 mm | 4,897 mm |
| Units Produced | — | 18,832 |
| Original MSRP | — | $10,339 |
| Value (Excellent) | $85,000 | $20,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Rarity | 5/10 | 6/10 |
On balance, the 2016 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 1LE makes a stronger case on paper with more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. However, the 1982 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 Cross-Fire Injection counters with better value, and its appeal extends beyond mere numbers. Choose the 2016 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 1LE for outright capability, or the 1982 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 Cross-Fire Injection for a more distinctive ownership experience.
Few model names carry as much weight as the Chevrolet Camaro. The 2016 and 1982 iterations represent different chapters in this storied nameplate's history, each reflecting the priorities and technologies of its era. The 2016 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 1LE holds a clear advantage in raw power with 650 hp compared to 165 hp, a 485-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Chevrolet Camaro uses a V8 OHV 16V Supercharged displacing 6,162 cc, while the Chevrolet Camaro relies on a V8 OHV with 5,031 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2016 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 1LE edges ahead at 3.4 seconds versus 8.6 seconds. On the collector market, the 2016 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 1LE commands a significant premium over the 1982 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 Cross-Fire Injection, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.