France vs Japan — 2013 vs 1989
| RCZ R | CR-X SiR | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 270 hp | 160 hp |
| Torque | 243 lb-ft | 111 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,598 cc | 1,595 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9 sec | 7.1 sec |
| Top Speed | 155 mph | 130 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 14.3 sec | 15.3 sec |
| Weight | 2,822 lbs | 2,072 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,612 mm | 2,250 mm |
| Length | 4,290 mm | 3,675 mm |
| Units Produced | 3,000 | — |
| Value (Excellent) | $35,000 | $35,000 |
| Collectibility | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 7/10 |
Two outstanding machines, each with compelling strengths. The 2013 Peugeot RCZ R excels in more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed, while the 1989 Honda CR-X SiR stands out for lighter weight, stronger collectibility. The best advice? Drive both if you can, then follow your instincts.
Putting the 2013 Peugeot RCZ R against the 1989 Honda CR-X SiR is a comparison that enthusiasts have debated for decades. Each car reflects distinct design philosophies shaped by different automotive cultures — France versus Japan. The 2013 Peugeot RCZ R holds a clear advantage in raw power with 270 hp compared to 160 hp, a 110-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Peugeot RCZ uses a Inline-4 Turbocharged displacing 1,598 cc, while the Honda CR-X relies on a Inline-4 DOHC VTEC with 1,595 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2013 Peugeot RCZ R edges ahead at 5.9 seconds versus 7.1 seconds. The Honda CR-X carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 750 lbs lighter. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1989 Honda CR-X SiR rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.