France vs Japan — 2013 vs 1994
| RCZ R | FTO GPX Mivec | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 270 hp | 200 hp |
| Torque | 243 lb-ft | 148 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,598 cc | 1,998 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9 sec | 6.5 sec |
| Top Speed | 155 mph | 143 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 14.3 sec | 15.0 sec |
| Weight | 2,822 lbs | 2,579 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,612 mm | 2,500 mm |
| Length | 4,290 mm | 4,320 mm |
| Units Produced | 3,000 | 65,000 |
| Value (Excellent) | $35,000 | $22,000 |
| Collectibility | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 7/10 |
This matchup is remarkably close. The 2013 Peugeot RCZ R offers more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed, while the 1994 Mitsubishi FTO GPX Mivec counters with lighter weight, stronger collectibility, better value. Neither holds a decisive advantage, making this a true enthusiast's dilemma. Your choice ultimately depends on which driving philosophy resonates more with you.
When France engineering meets Japan craftsmanship, the result is one of the most compelling matchups in the classic car world. The 2013 Peugeot RCZ R and 1994 Mitsubishi FTO GPX Mivec embody their respective national automotive traditions while competing in the same arena. The 2013 Peugeot RCZ R holds a clear advantage in raw power with 270 hp compared to 200 hp, a 70-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Peugeot RCZ uses a Inline-4 Turbocharged displacing 1,598 cc, while the Mitsubishi FTO relies on a V6 DOHC MIVEC with 1,998 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2013 Peugeot RCZ R edges ahead at 5.9 seconds versus 6.5 seconds. The Mitsubishi FTO carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 243 lbs lighter. Rarity plays a significant role here — with only 3,000 units built, the 2013 Peugeot RCZ R is considerably scarcer than the Mitsubishi FTO's 65,000 examples.