USA vs Japan — 2003 vs 1987
| Neon SRT-4 ACR | CR-X Si | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 230 hp | 91 hp |
| Torque | 250 lb-ft | 91 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 2,429 cc | 1,488 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3 sec | 9.2 sec |
| Top Speed | 153 mph | 109 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.8 sec | 16.8 sec |
| Weight | 3,000 lbs | 1,799 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,667 mm | 2,250 mm |
| Length | 4,445 mm | 3,675 mm |
| Units Produced | 25,000 | 78,463 |
| Original MSRP | $20,995 | $7,775 |
| Value (Excellent) | $25,000 | $20,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Rarity | 5/10 | 6/10 |
The 2003 Dodge Neon SRT-4 ACR holds an edge across most measurable criteria, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. That said, the 1987 Honda CR-X Si brings lighter weight, stronger collectibility and remains a compelling choice for enthusiasts who value Honda heritage. The right pick depends on whether you prioritize specifications or the intangible qualities that make a car truly special.
Putting the 2003 Dodge Neon SRT-4 ACR against the 1987 Honda CR-X Si is a comparison that enthusiasts have debated for decades. Each car reflects distinct design philosophies shaped by different automotive cultures — USA versus Japan. The 2003 Dodge Neon SRT-4 ACR holds a clear advantage in raw power with 230 hp compared to 91 hp, a 139-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Dodge Neon SRT-4 uses a I4 DOHC Turbocharged displacing 2,429 cc, while the Honda CR-X relies on a Inline-4 SOHC with 1,488 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2003 Dodge Neon SRT-4 ACR edges ahead at 5.3 seconds versus 9.2 seconds. The Honda CR-X carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 1201 lbs lighter. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1987 Honda CR-X Si rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.