Japan vs Japan — 1997 vs 1984
| Civic Type R EK9 | City Turbo II Bulldog | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 185 hp | 110 hp |
| Torque | 118 lb-ft | 101 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,595 cc | 1,231 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7 sec | 8.5 sec |
| Top Speed | 143 mph | 112 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 15.0 sec | 16.5 sec |
| Weight | 2,315 lbs | 1,587 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,620 mm | 2,250 mm |
| Length | 4,180 mm | 3,380 mm |
| Value (Excellent) | $80,000 | $55,000 |
| Collectibility | 8/10 | 9/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 9/10 |
Two outstanding machines, each with compelling strengths. The 1997 Honda Civic Type R EK9 excels in more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed, while the 1984 Honda City Turbo II Bulldog stands out for lighter weight, stronger collectibility. The best advice? Drive both if you can, then follow your instincts.
The 1997 Honda Civic Type R EK9 and 1984 Honda City Turbo II Bulldog share a manufacturer in Honda, but that's where the similarities get interesting. These two models reveal the versatility and ambition of the Honda brand. The 1997 Honda Civic Type R EK9 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 185 hp compared to 110 hp, a 75-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Honda Civic Type R uses a Inline-4 DOHC VTEC (B16B) displacing 1,595 cc, while the Honda City Turbo II relies on a Inline-3 SOHC Turbo with 1,231 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1997 Honda Civic Type R EK9 edges ahead at 6.7 seconds versus 8.5 seconds. The Honda City Turbo II carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 728 lbs lighter. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.