Plymouth AAR 'Cuda

vs

Ford Mustang

USA vs USA β€” 1970 vs 1968

Plymouth AAR 'Cuda (1970)
Ford Mustang (1968)
Specifications
AAR 'Cuda 340 Six PackMustang GT/CS (California Special)
Horsepower290 hp230 hp
Torque340 lb-ft310 lb-ft
Engine Size5,572 cc4,949 cc
0-60 mph5.8 sec8.5 sec
Top Speed125 mph115 mph
ΒΌ Mile14.0 sec16.2 sec
Weight3,400 lbs3,000 lbs
Wheelbase2,743 mm2,743 mm
Length4,871 mm4,613 mm
Units Produced2,7244,118
Original MSRP$3,563$3,100
Value (Excellent)$180,000$95,000
Collectibility9/108/10
Rarity9/108/10
The Verdict

On balance, the 1970 Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340 Six Pack makes a stronger case on paper with more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. However, the 1968 Ford Mustang GT/CS (California Special) counters with lighter weight, better value, and its appeal extends beyond mere numbers. Choose the 1970 Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340 Six Pack for outright capability, or the 1968 Ford Mustang GT/CS (California Special) for a more distinctive ownership experience.

Overview

In the world of Pony Car cars, few comparisons generate as much discussion as the 1970 Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340 Six Pack versus the 1968 Ford Mustang GT/CS (California Special). Both hail from Muscle era and represent the pinnacle of their respective manufacturers' ambitions. The 1970 Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340 Six Pack holds a clear advantage in raw power with 290 hp compared to 230 hp, a 60-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Plymouth AAR 'Cuda uses a V8 OHV (340 Six Pack) displacing 5,572 cc, while the Ford Mustang relies on a V8 OHV with 4,949 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1970 Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340 Six Pack edges ahead at 5.8 seconds versus 8.5 seconds. The Ford Mustang carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 400 lbs lighter. Each of these machines offers a unique window into the era that produced it, making both worthy of consideration by collectors and drivers alike.