USA vs USA β 1962 vs 1957
| Lark Daytona Convertible | Golden Hawk | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 225 hp | 275 hp |
| Torque | 280 lb-ft | 325 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 4,736 cc | 4,736 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 9.5 sec | 7.8 sec |
| Top Speed | 115 mph | 120 mph |
| ΒΌ Mile | 17.0 sec | 16.0 sec |
| Weight | 3,049 lbs | 3,600 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,794 mm | 3,048 mm |
| Length | 4,775 mm | 5,207 mm |
| Units Produced | 3,602 | 4,356 |
| Original MSRP | $2,814 | $3,182 |
| Value (Excellent) | $45,000 | $75,000 |
| Collectibility | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 7/10 |
The 1957 Studebaker Golden Hawk emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1962 Studebaker Lark Daytona Convertible counters with lighter weight, better value, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
The 1962 Studebaker Lark Daytona Convertible and 1957 Studebaker Golden Hawk share a manufacturer in Studebaker, but that's where the similarities get interesting. These two models reveal the versatility and ambition of the Studebaker brand. The 1957 Studebaker Golden Hawk holds a clear advantage in raw power with 275 hp compared to 225 hp, a 50-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Studebaker Lark uses a V8 OHV displacing 4,736 cc, while the Studebaker Golden Hawk relies on a V8 OHV Supercharged with 4,736 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1957 Studebaker Golden Hawk edges ahead at 7.8 seconds versus 9.5 seconds. The Studebaker Lark carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 551 lbs lighter. On the collector market, the 1957 Studebaker Golden Hawk commands a significant premium over the 1962 Studebaker Lark Daytona Convertible, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1957 Studebaker Golden Hawk rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.