Sweden vs Sweden — 1996 vs 1981
| 850 R AWD | 242 Turbo Group A Homologation | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 250 hp | 155 hp |
| Torque | 258 lb-ft | 181 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 2,319 cc | 2,127 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5 sec | 8.9 sec |
| Top Speed | 155 mph | 124 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 14.8 sec | 16.7 sec |
| Weight | 3,329 lbs | 2,932 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,664 mm | 2,640 mm |
| Length | 4,706 mm | 4,790 mm |
| Original MSRP | $36,700 | $16,495 |
| Value (Excellent) | $25,000 | $40,000 |
| Collectibility | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Rarity | 6/10 | 7/10 |
On balance, the 1996 Volvo 850 R AWD makes a stronger case on paper with more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. However, the 1981 Volvo 242 Turbo Group A Homologation counters with lighter weight, stronger collectibility, and its appeal extends beyond mere numbers. Choose the 1996 Volvo 850 R AWD for outright capability, or the 1981 Volvo 242 Turbo Group A Homologation for a more distinctive ownership experience.
Volvo has long offered a diverse lineup, and comparing the 1996 Volvo 850 R AWD with the 1981 Volvo 242 Turbo Group A Homologation highlights the breadth of the marque's engineering philosophy. The 1996 Volvo 850 R AWD holds a clear advantage in raw power with 250 hp compared to 155 hp, a 95-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Volvo 850 uses a Inline-5 DOHC Turbo displacing 2,319 cc, while the Volvo 242 Turbo relies on a Inline-4 Turbo SOHC with 2,127 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1996 Volvo 850 R AWD edges ahead at 6.5 seconds versus 8.9 seconds. The Volvo 242 Turbo carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 397 lbs lighter. Each of these machines offers a unique window into the era that produced it, making both worthy of consideration by collectors and drivers alike.