Japan vs Japan — 1996 vs 1992
| Lancer Evolution Evo VI TME | Lancer Evolution Evolution III (CE9A) | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 280 hp | 270 hp |
| Torque | 275 lb-ft | 228 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,997 cc | 1,997 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4 sec | 5.0 sec |
| Top Speed | 155 mph | 149 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.1 sec | 13.5 sec |
| Weight | 2,998 lbs | — |
| Wheelbase | 2,510 mm | 2,510 mm |
| Length | 4,350 mm | 4,310 mm |
| Units Produced | — | 5,000 |
| Value (Excellent) | $100,000 | $75,000 |
| Collectibility | 8/10 | 5/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 7/10 |
The 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evo VI TME holds an edge across most measurable criteria, offering quicker acceleration, higher top speed, stronger collectibility. That said, the 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution III (CE9A) brings its own distinct appeal and remains a compelling choice for enthusiasts who value Mitsubishi heritage. The right pick depends on whether you prioritize specifications or the intangible qualities that make a car truly special.
Tracing the evolution of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution from 1996 to 1992 offers a compelling look at how automotive design and engineering progressed. These two variants showcase the changing face of Mitsubishi. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evo VI TME producing 280 hp and the 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution III (CE9A) delivering 270 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution uses a Inline-4 Turbo 4G63T displacing 1,997 cc, while the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution relies on a Inline-4 DOHC 16V Turbocharged with 1,997 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evo VI TME edges ahead at 4.4 seconds versus 5.0 seconds. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evo VI TME rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.