Sweden vs Sweden — 2003 vs 1977
| S60 R AWD | 262C Bertone Coupe | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 300 hp | 140 hp |
| Torque | 295 lb-ft | 159 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 2,521 cc | 2,664 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4 sec | 11.5 sec |
| Top Speed | 155 mph | 109 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.8 sec | 18.0 sec |
| Weight | 3,589 lbs | 3,240 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,715 mm | 2,640 mm |
| Length | 4,575 mm | 4,870 mm |
| Units Produced | 15,000 | 6,622 |
| Original MSRP | $37,350 | $17,750 |
| Value (Excellent) | $25,000 | $45,000 |
| Collectibility | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Rarity | 6/10 | 7/10 |
Two outstanding machines, each with compelling strengths. The 2003 Volvo S60 R AWD excels in more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed, while the 1977 Volvo 262C Bertone Coupe stands out for lighter weight, greater rarity, stronger collectibility. The best advice? Drive both if you can, then follow your instincts.
The 2003 Volvo S60 R AWD and 1977 Volvo 262C Bertone Coupe share a manufacturer in Volvo, but that's where the similarities get interesting. These two models reveal the versatility and ambition of the Volvo brand. The 2003 Volvo S60 R AWD holds a clear advantage in raw power with 300 hp compared to 140 hp, a 160-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Volvo S60 uses a Inline-5 Turbocharged displacing 2,521 cc, while the Volvo 262C relies on a V6 OHV with 2,664 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2003 Volvo S60 R AWD edges ahead at 5.4 seconds versus 11.5 seconds. The Volvo 262C carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 349 lbs lighter. Whether you prioritize driving dynamics, heritage, or aesthetic appeal, both contenders make a strong case for themselves.