Sweden vs Sweden — 2003 vs 1981
| S60 R AWD | 242 Turbo Group A Homologation | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 300 hp | 155 hp |
| Torque | 295 lb-ft | 181 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 2,521 cc | 2,127 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4 sec | 8.9 sec |
| Top Speed | 155 mph | 124 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.8 sec | 16.7 sec |
| Weight | 3,589 lbs | 2,932 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,715 mm | 2,640 mm |
| Length | 4,575 mm | 4,790 mm |
| Units Produced | 15,000 | — |
| Original MSRP | $37,350 | $16,495 |
| Value (Excellent) | $25,000 | $40,000 |
| Collectibility | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Rarity | 6/10 | 7/10 |
The 2003 Volvo S60 R AWD holds an edge across most measurable criteria, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. That said, the 1981 Volvo 242 Turbo Group A Homologation brings lighter weight, stronger collectibility and remains a compelling choice for enthusiasts who value Volvo heritage. The right pick depends on whether you prioritize specifications or the intangible qualities that make a car truly special.
The 2003 Volvo S60 R AWD and 1981 Volvo 242 Turbo Group A Homologation share a manufacturer in Volvo, but that's where the similarities get interesting. These two models reveal the versatility and ambition of the Volvo brand. The 2003 Volvo S60 R AWD holds a clear advantage in raw power with 300 hp compared to 155 hp, a 145-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Volvo S60 uses a Inline-5 Turbocharged displacing 2,521 cc, while the Volvo 242 Turbo relies on a Inline-4 Turbo SOHC with 2,127 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2003 Volvo S60 R AWD edges ahead at 5.4 seconds versus 8.9 seconds. The Volvo 242 Turbo carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 657 lbs lighter. Whether you prioritize driving dynamics, heritage, or aesthetic appeal, both contenders make a strong case for themselves.