Japan vs Italy — 1967 vs 1963
| Cosmo Sport 110S (L10A) | Sebring | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 110 hp | 235 hp |
| Torque | 96 lb-ft | 224 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 982 cc | 3,485 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 10.2 sec | 8.2 sec |
| Top Speed | 115 mph | 140 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 17.5 sec | 16.0 sec |
| Weight | 2,072 lbs | 3,197 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,200 mm | 2,620 mm |
| Length | 4,140 mm | 4,570 mm |
| Units Produced | 1,519 | 591 |
| Original MSRP | — | $11,600 |
| Value (Excellent) | $350,000 | $180,000 |
| Collectibility | 9/10 | 7/10 |
| Rarity | 9/10 | 7/10 |
The 1963 Maserati Sebring emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1967 Mazda Cosmo Sport 110S (L10A) counters with lighter weight, stronger collectibility, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
Putting the 1967 Mazda Cosmo Sport 110S (L10A) against the 1963 Maserati Sebring is a comparison that enthusiasts have debated for decades. Each car reflects distinct design philosophies shaped by different automotive cultures — Japan versus Italy. The 1963 Maserati Sebring holds a clear advantage in raw power with 235 hp compared to 110 hp, a 125-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mazda Cosmo Sport uses a Twin-Rotor Wankel 10A displacing 982 cc, while the Maserati Sebring relies on a Inline-6 DOHC with 3,485 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1963 Maserati Sebring edges ahead at 8.2 seconds versus 10.2 seconds. The Mazda Cosmo Sport carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 1125 lbs lighter. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1967 Mazda Cosmo Sport 110S (L10A) rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.