Czech Republic vs Czech Republic — 2003 vs 2019
| Fabia RS vRS 1.9 TDI | Kodiaq RS 2.0 TSI 245 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 130 hp | 245 hp |
| Torque | 229 lb-ft | 273 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,896 cc | 1,984 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 9.0 sec | 6.5 sec |
| Top Speed | 127 mph | 145 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 17.0 sec | 14.8 sec |
| Weight | 2,668 lbs | 3,844 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,462 mm | 2,791 mm |
| Length | 3,975 mm | 4,699 mm |
| Original MSRP | — | $50,000 |
| Value (Excellent) | $18,000 | $50,000 |
| Collectibility | 4/10 | 2/10 |
| Rarity | 5/10 | 4/10 |
Two outstanding machines, each with compelling strengths. The 2003 Skoda Fabia RS vRS 1.9 TDI excels in lighter weight, stronger collectibility, better value, while the 2019 Skoda Kodiaq RS 2.0 TSI 245 stands out for more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The best advice? Drive both if you can, then follow your instincts.
The 2003 Skoda Fabia RS vRS 1.9 TDI and 2019 Skoda Kodiaq RS 2.0 TSI 245 share a manufacturer in Skoda, but that's where the similarities get interesting. These two models reveal the versatility and ambition of the Skoda brand. The 2019 Skoda Kodiaq RS 2.0 TSI 245 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 245 hp compared to 130 hp, a 115-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Skoda Fabia RS uses a Inline-4 SOHC Turbodiesel displacing 1,896 cc, while the Skoda Kodiaq RS relies on a I4 DOHC Turbo with 1,984 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2019 Skoda Kodiaq RS 2.0 TSI 245 edges ahead at 6.5 seconds versus 9.0 seconds. The Skoda Fabia RS carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 1176 lbs lighter. On the collector market, the 2019 Skoda Kodiaq RS 2.0 TSI 245 commands a significant premium over the 2003 Skoda Fabia RS vRS 1.9 TDI, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity. From a collectibility standpoint, the 2003 Skoda Fabia RS vRS 1.9 TDI rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.