Japan vs Japan — 1992 vs 2003
| RX-7 Type RS (FD3S) | RX-8 Type S | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 280 hp | 232 hp |
| Torque | 232 lb-ft | 159 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,308 cc | 1,308 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8 sec | 6.0 sec |
| Top Speed | 158 mph | 146 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.5 sec | 14.5 sec |
| Weight | — | 2,888 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,425 mm | 2,700 mm |
| Length | 4,295 mm | 4,435 mm |
| Units Produced | — | 192,094 |
| Original MSRP | — | $26,700 |
| Value (Excellent) | $90,000 | $25,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Rarity | 6/10 | 4/10 |
The 1992 Mazda RX-7 Type RS (FD3S) holds an edge across most measurable criteria, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. That said, the 2003 Mazda RX-8 Type S brings better value and remains a compelling choice for enthusiasts who value Mazda heritage. The right pick depends on whether you prioritize specifications or the intangible qualities that make a car truly special.
The Mazda RX-7 lineage tells a fascinating story of automotive evolution. Comparing the 1992 Mazda RX-7 Type RS (FD3S) with the 2003 Mazda RX-8 Type S reveals how Mazda refined and reimagined one of its most important nameplates over the years. The 1992 Mazda RX-7 Type RS (FD3S) holds a clear advantage in raw power with 280 hp compared to 232 hp, a 48-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mazda RX-7 uses a Twin-Rotor Twin-Turbo (Wankel) displacing 1,308 cc, while the Mazda RX-8 relies on a Rotary (Wankel) Twin-Rotor with 1,308 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1992 Mazda RX-7 Type RS (FD3S) edges ahead at 4.8 seconds versus 6.0 seconds. On the collector market, the 1992 Mazda RX-7 Type RS (FD3S) commands a significant premium over the 2003 Mazda RX-8 Type S, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.