Alpina B10

vs

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution

Germany vs Japan — 1989 vs 1997

Alpina B10 (1989)
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution (1997)
Specifications
B10 Bi-TurboLancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A
Horsepower360 hp280 hp
Torque383 lb-ft268 lb-ft
Engine Size3,430 cc1,997 cc
0-60 mph5.0 sec4.7 sec
Top Speed181 mph152 mph
¼ Mile13.4 sec13.5 sec
Weight3,638 lbs2,976 lbs
Wheelbase2,761 mm2,510 mm
Length4,720 mm4,350 mm
Units Produced5076,600
Original MSRP$95,000
Value (Excellent)$250,000$95,000
Collectibility9/109/10
Rarity9/108/10
The Verdict

Two outstanding machines, each with compelling strengths. The 1989 Alpina B10 Bi-Turbo excels in more power, higher top speed, greater rarity, while the 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A stands out for quicker acceleration, lighter weight, better value. The best advice? Drive both if you can, then follow your instincts.

Overview

Putting the 1989 Alpina B10 Bi-Turbo against the 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A is a comparison that enthusiasts have debated for decades. Each car reflects distinct design philosophies shaped by different automotive cultures — Germany versus Japan. The 1989 Alpina B10 Bi-Turbo holds a clear advantage in raw power with 360 hp compared to 280 hp, a 80-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Alpina B10 uses a Inline-6 displacing 3,430 cc, while the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution relies on a Inline-4 DOHC Turbo with 1,997 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A edges ahead at 4.7 seconds versus 5.0 seconds. The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 662 lbs lighter. Rarity plays a significant role here — with only 507 units built, the 1989 Alpina B10 Bi-Turbo is considerably scarcer than the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution's 6,600 examples. On the collector market, the 1989 Alpina B10 Bi-Turbo commands a significant premium over the 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.