Japan vs Japan — 2001 vs 1997
| Lancer Evolution Evolution VII MR | Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 280 hp | 280 hp |
| Torque | 295 lb-ft | 268 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,997 cc | 1,997 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4 sec | 4.7 sec |
| Top Speed | 155 mph | 152 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.0 sec | 13.5 sec |
| Weight | 2,998 lbs | 2,976 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,625 mm | 2,510 mm |
| Length | 4,455 mm | 4,350 mm |
| Units Produced | — | 6,600 |
| Value (Excellent) | $70,000 | $95,000 |
| Collectibility | 8/10 | 9/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 8/10 |
On balance, the 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution VII MR makes a stronger case on paper with quicker acceleration, higher top speed, better value. However, the 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A counters with stronger collectibility, and its appeal extends beyond mere numbers. Choose the 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution VII MR for outright capability, or the 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A for a more distinctive ownership experience.
Few model names carry as much weight as the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution. The 2001 and 1997 iterations represent different chapters in this storied nameplate's history, each reflecting the priorities and technologies of its era. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution VII MR producing 280 hp and the 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A delivering 280 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution uses a Inline-4 DOHC 16-valve turbo (4G63T) displacing 1,997 cc, while the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution relies on a Inline-4 DOHC Turbo with 1,997 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution VII MR edges ahead at 4.4 seconds versus 4.7 seconds. Each of these machines offers a unique window into the era that produced it, making both worthy of consideration by collectors and drivers alike.