Japan vs Japan — 1996 vs 1995
| Lancer Evolution Evo VI TME | Lancer Evolution GSR Evolution III | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 280 hp | 270 hp |
| Torque | 275 lb-ft | 228 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,997 cc | 1,997 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4 sec | 5.3 sec |
| Top Speed | 155 mph | 142 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.1 sec | 13.8 sec |
| Weight | 2,998 lbs | 2,778 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,510 mm | 2,510 mm |
| Length | 4,350 mm | 4,310 mm |
| Units Produced | — | 5,000 |
| Value (Excellent) | $100,000 | $70,000 |
| Collectibility | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 7/10 |
It's a closely fought contest. The 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evo VI TME brings quicker acceleration, higher top speed to the table, and the 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution GSR Evolution III answers with lighter weight. Both are excellent machines that reward their owners in different ways — there's no wrong answer here.
Few model names carry as much weight as the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution. The 1996 and 1995 iterations represent different chapters in this storied nameplate's history, each reflecting the priorities and technologies of its era. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evo VI TME producing 280 hp and the 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution GSR Evolution III delivering 270 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution uses a Inline-4 Turbo 4G63T displacing 1,997 cc, while the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution relies on a Inline-4 DOHC Turbo with 1,997 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evo VI TME edges ahead at 4.4 seconds versus 5.3 seconds. The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 220 lbs lighter. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.