Sweden vs Sweden — 2003 vs 1984
| S60 R AWD | 740 Turbo Intercooler Estate | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 300 hp | 160 hp |
| Torque | 295 lb-ft | 195 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 2,521 cc | 2,316 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4 sec | 8.2 sec |
| Top Speed | 155 mph | 127 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.8 sec | 16.2 sec |
| Weight | 3,589 lbs | 3,042 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,715 mm | 2,770 mm |
| Length | 4,575 mm | 4,785 mm |
| Units Produced | 15,000 | — |
| Original MSRP | $37,350 | $22,490 |
| Value (Excellent) | $25,000 | $18,000 |
| Collectibility | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Rarity | 6/10 | 4/10 |
Two outstanding machines, each with compelling strengths. The 2003 Volvo S60 R AWD excels in more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed, while the 1984 Volvo 740 Turbo Intercooler Estate stands out for lighter weight, better value. The best advice? Drive both if you can, then follow your instincts.
The 2003 Volvo S60 R AWD and 1984 Volvo 740 Turbo Intercooler Estate share a manufacturer in Volvo, but that's where the similarities get interesting. These two models reveal the versatility and ambition of the Volvo brand. The 2003 Volvo S60 R AWD holds a clear advantage in raw power with 300 hp compared to 160 hp, a 140-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Volvo S60 uses a Inline-5 Turbocharged displacing 2,521 cc, while the Volvo 740 Turbo relies on a Inline-4 Turbo SOHC with 2,316 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2003 Volvo S60 R AWD edges ahead at 5.4 seconds versus 8.2 seconds. The Volvo 740 Turbo carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 547 lbs lighter. Whether you prioritize driving dynamics, heritage, or aesthetic appeal, both contenders make a strong case for themselves.