Japan vs Japan — 1992 vs 2001
| Lancer Evolution Evolution III (CE9A) | Lancer Evolution Evolution VII MR | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 270 hp | 280 hp |
| Torque | 228 lb-ft | 295 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,997 cc | 1,997 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0 sec | 4.4 sec |
| Top Speed | 149 mph | 155 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.5 sec | 13.0 sec |
| Weight | — | 2,998 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,510 mm | 2,625 mm |
| Length | 4,310 mm | 4,455 mm |
| Units Produced | 5,000 | — |
| Value (Excellent) | $75,000 | $70,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 8/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 7/10 |
The 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution VII MR emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering quicker acceleration, higher top speed, stronger collectibility. The 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution III (CE9A) counters with its unique character, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
Tracing the evolution of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution from 1992 to 2001 offers a compelling look at how automotive design and engineering progressed. These two variants showcase the changing face of Mitsubishi. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution III (CE9A) producing 270 hp and the 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution VII MR delivering 280 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution uses a Inline-4 DOHC 16V Turbocharged displacing 1,997 cc, while the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution relies on a Inline-4 DOHC 16-valve turbo (4G63T) with 1,997 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution VII MR edges ahead at 4.4 seconds versus 5.0 seconds. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference. From a collectibility standpoint, the 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution VII MR rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.