Sweden vs Sweden — 1966 vs 1996
| 142/144/145 142 S | 850 R AWD | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 118 hp | 250 hp |
| Torque | 125 lb-ft | 258 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,986 cc | 2,319 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 12.5 sec | 6.5 sec |
| Top Speed | 106 mph | 155 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 18.5 sec | 14.8 sec |
| Weight | — | 3,329 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,600 mm | 2,664 mm |
| Length | 4,581 mm | 4,706 mm |
| Original MSRP | — | $36,700 |
| Value (Excellent) | $22,000 | $25,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Rarity | 3/10 | 6/10 |
The 1996 Volvo 850 R AWD emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1966 Volvo 142/144/145 142 S counters with its unique character, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
Within the Volvo stable, the 1966 Volvo 142/144/145 142 S and 1996 Volvo 850 R AWD represent different approaches to performance and purpose. Both carry the Volvo badge, yet each carves out its own distinct identity. The 1996 Volvo 850 R AWD holds a clear advantage in raw power with 250 hp compared to 118 hp, a 132-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Volvo 142/144/145 uses a Inline-4 OHV displacing 1,986 cc, while the Volvo 850 relies on a Inline-5 DOHC Turbo with 2,319 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1996 Volvo 850 R AWD edges ahead at 6.5 seconds versus 12.5 seconds. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.