Japan vs Japan — 1992 vs 1997
| Lancer Evolution Evolution I CD9A | Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 247 hp | 280 hp |
| Torque | 228 lb-ft | 268 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,997 cc | 1,997 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3 sec | 4.7 sec |
| Top Speed | 143 mph | 152 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.9 sec | 13.5 sec |
| Weight | 2,579 lbs | 2,976 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,500 mm | 2,510 mm |
| Length | 4,310 mm | 4,350 mm |
| Units Produced | 5,000 | 6,600 |
| Value (Excellent) | $120,000 | $95,000 |
| Collectibility | 9/10 | 9/10 |
| Rarity | 9/10 | 8/10 |
The 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution I CD9A counters with lighter weight, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
Tracing the evolution of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution from 1992 to 1997 offers a compelling look at how automotive design and engineering progressed. These two variants showcase the changing face of Mitsubishi. The 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A holds a clear advantage in raw power with 280 hp compared to 247 hp, a 33-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution uses a Inline-4 DOHC 16-valve turbo (4G63T) displacing 1,997 cc, while the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution relies on a Inline-4 DOHC Turbo with 1,997 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A edges ahead at 4.7 seconds versus 5.3 seconds. The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 397 lbs lighter. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.