Japan vs Japan — 1992 vs 1995
| Lancer Evolution Evolution III (CE9A) | Eclipse GSX Turbo (D32A) | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 270 hp | 210 hp |
| Torque | 228 lb-ft | 220 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,997 cc | 1,997 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0 sec | 6.1 sec |
| Top Speed | 149 mph | 143 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.5 sec | 14.5 sec |
| Weight | — | 3,230 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,510 mm | 2,510 mm |
| Length | 4,310 mm | 4,395 mm |
| Units Produced | 5,000 | — |
| Original MSRP | — | $23,999 |
| Value (Excellent) | $75,000 | $25,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 5/10 |
This matchup is remarkably close. The 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution III (CE9A) offers more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed, while the 1995 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX Turbo (D32A) counters with stronger collectibility, better value. Neither holds a decisive advantage, making this a true enthusiast's dilemma. Your choice ultimately depends on which driving philosophy resonates more with you.
Within the Mitsubishi stable, the 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution III (CE9A) and 1995 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX Turbo (D32A) represent different approaches to performance and purpose. Both carry the Mitsubishi badge, yet each carves out its own distinct identity. The 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution III (CE9A) holds a clear advantage in raw power with 270 hp compared to 210 hp, a 60-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution uses a Inline-4 DOHC 16V Turbocharged displacing 1,997 cc, while the Mitsubishi Eclipse relies on a Inline-4 DOHC Turbocharged with 1,997 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution III (CE9A) edges ahead at 5.0 seconds versus 6.1 seconds. On the collector market, the 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution III (CE9A) commands a significant premium over the 1995 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX Turbo (D32A), reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.