UK vs UK — 1962 vs 1959
| Spitfire Mk IV 1500 | Herald 13/60 Convertible | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 71 hp | 61 hp |
| Torque | 85 lb-ft | 74 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,493 cc | 1,296 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 13.2 sec | 17.0 sec |
| Top Speed | 100 mph | 85 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 19.0 sec | 21.0 sec |
| Weight | 1,680 lbs | 1,848 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,108 mm | 2,311 mm |
| Length | 3,759 mm | 3,886 mm |
| Units Produced | 314,332 | 232,000 |
| Original MSRP | $2,749 | $1,900 |
| Value (Excellent) | $22,000 | $20,000 |
| Collectibility | 6/10 | 4/10 |
| Rarity | 3/10 | 4/10 |
The 1962 Triumph Spitfire Mk IV 1500 holds an edge across most measurable criteria, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. That said, the 1959 Triumph Herald 13/60 Convertible brings its own distinct appeal and remains a compelling choice for enthusiasts who value Triumph heritage. The right pick depends on whether you prioritize specifications or the intangible qualities that make a car truly special.
The 1962 Triumph Spitfire Mk IV 1500 and 1959 Triumph Herald 13/60 Convertible share a manufacturer in Triumph, but that's where the similarities get interesting. These two models reveal the versatility and ambition of the Triumph brand. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1962 Triumph Spitfire Mk IV 1500 producing 71 hp and the 1959 Triumph Herald 13/60 Convertible delivering 61 hp. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1962 Triumph Spitfire Mk IV 1500 edges ahead at 13.2 seconds versus 17.0 seconds. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1962 Triumph Spitfire Mk IV 1500 rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.