Japan vs Japan — 1992 vs 2003
| Lancer Evolution I (CD9A) | Lancer Evolution VIII MR (CT9A) | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 250 hp | 280 hp |
| Torque | 228 lb-ft | 295 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,997 cc | 1,997 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3 sec | 4.3 sec |
| Top Speed | 143 mph | 155 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 14.0 sec | 13.0 sec |
| Weight | 2,579 lbs | 3,086 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,500 mm | 2,625 mm |
| Length | 4,310 mm | 4,490 mm |
| Units Produced | 5,000 | — |
| Original MSRP | — | $33,000 |
| Value (Excellent) | $65,000 | $55,000 |
| Collectibility | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 6/10 |
The 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII MR (CT9A) emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution I (CD9A) counters with lighter weight, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
Tracing the evolution of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution from 1992 to 2003 offers a compelling look at how automotive design and engineering progressed. These two variants showcase the changing face of Mitsubishi. The 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII MR (CT9A) holds a clear advantage in raw power with 280 hp compared to 250 hp, a 30-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution uses a Inline-4 DOHC 16V Turbocharged displacing 1,997 cc, while the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution relies on a Inline-4 DOHC 16V MIVEC Turbocharged with 1,997 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII MR (CT9A) edges ahead at 4.3 seconds versus 5.3 seconds. The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 507 lbs lighter. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.