Japan vs Japan — 1996 vs 2000
| Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A | Lancer Evolution VI Tommi Makinen Edition | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 280 hp | 280 hp |
| Torque | 260 lb-ft | — |
| Engine Size | 1,997 cc | — |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7 sec | — |
| Top Speed | 152 mph | 149 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.3 sec | — |
| Weight | 2,778 lbs | 2,998 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,510 mm | 2,510 mm |
| Length | 4,330 mm | 4,350 mm |
| Units Produced | — | 2,500 |
| Value (Excellent) | $85,000 | — |
| Collectibility | 8/10 | 9/10 |
| Rarity | 8/10 | 9/10 |
This matchup is remarkably close. The 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A offers higher top speed, lighter weight, while the 2000 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI Tommi Makinen Edition counters with stronger collectibility. Neither holds a decisive advantage, making this a true enthusiast's dilemma. Your choice ultimately depends on which driving philosophy resonates more with you.
The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution lineage tells a fascinating story of automotive evolution. Comparing the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A with the 2000 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI Tommi Makinen Edition reveals how Mitsubishi refined and reimagined one of its most important nameplates over the years. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A producing 280 hp and the 2000 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI Tommi Makinen Edition delivering 280 hp. The engine configurations differ significantly — a Inline-4 DOHC 16-valve turbo (4G63T) in the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution versus a Inline-4 Turbo in the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI Tommi Makinen Edition. The 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A claims a higher top speed at 152 mph compared to 149 mph. The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 220 lbs lighter. Both cars have earned their place in automotive history and continue to captivate enthusiasts around the world.