Japan vs Japan — 1992 vs 1995
| Lancer Evolution Evolution I CD9A | Lancer Evolution GSR Evolution III | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 247 hp | 270 hp |
| Torque | 228 lb-ft | 228 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,997 cc | 1,997 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3 sec | 5.3 sec |
| Top Speed | 143 mph | 142 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.9 sec | 13.8 sec |
| Weight | 2,579 lbs | 2,778 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,500 mm | 2,510 mm |
| Length | 4,310 mm | 4,310 mm |
| Units Produced | 5,000 | 5,000 |
| Value (Excellent) | $120,000 | $70,000 |
| Collectibility | 9/10 | 8/10 |
| Rarity | 9/10 | 7/10 |
The 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution I CD9A holds an edge across most measurable criteria, offering higher top speed, lighter weight, stronger collectibility. That said, the 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution GSR Evolution III brings quicker acceleration and remains a compelling choice for enthusiasts who value Mitsubishi heritage. The right pick depends on whether you prioritize specifications or the intangible qualities that make a car truly special.
The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution lineage tells a fascinating story of automotive evolution. Comparing the 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution I CD9A with the 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution GSR Evolution III reveals how Mitsubishi refined and reimagined one of its most important nameplates over the years. The 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution GSR Evolution III holds a clear advantage in raw power with 270 hp compared to 247 hp, a 23-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution uses a Inline-4 DOHC 16-valve turbo (4G63T) displacing 1,997 cc, while the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution relies on a Inline-4 DOHC Turbo with 1,997 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution GSR Evolution III edges ahead at 5.3 seconds versus 5.3 seconds. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.