Austin-Healey 3000 MkIII

vs

Lotus Elan Sprint

United Kingdom vs United Kingdom — 1967 vs 1971

Austin-Healey 3000 MkIII (1967)
Lotus Elan Sprint (1971)
Specifications
3000 MkIII Phase 2Elan Sprint Fixed Head Coupe
Horsepower150 hp126 hp
Torque178 lb-ft117 lb-ft
Engine Size2,912 cc1,558 cc
0-60 mph9.8 sec6.7 sec
Top Speed120 mph120 mph
¼ Mile17.3 sec15.2 sec
Weight2,509 lbs1,519 lbs
Wheelbase2,337 mm2,134 mm
Length3,962 mm3,658 mm
Units Produced17,7121,353
Original MSRP$3,595$4,795
Value (Excellent)$95,000$75,000
Collectibility9/109/10
Rarity7/108/10
The Verdict

The 1971 Lotus Elan Sprint Fixed Head Coupe emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering quicker acceleration, lighter weight, greater rarity. The 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 MkIII Phase 2 counters with more power, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.

Overview

The 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 MkIII Phase 2 and 1971 Lotus Elan Sprint Fixed Head Coupe stand as two of the most notable Sports Car cars from Muscle era. Both emerged during a period of intense competition, and choosing between them remains a passionate debate among collectors. The 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 MkIII Phase 2 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 150 hp compared to 126 hp, a 24-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Austin-Healey 3000 MkIII uses a Inline-6 OHV displacing 2,912 cc, while the Lotus Elan Sprint relies on a Inline-4 DOHC with 1,558 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1971 Lotus Elan Sprint Fixed Head Coupe edges ahead at 6.7 seconds versus 9.8 seconds. The Lotus Elan Sprint carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 990 lbs lighter. Rarity plays a significant role here — with only 1,353 units built, the 1971 Lotus Elan Sprint Fixed Head Coupe is considerably scarcer than the Austin-Healey 3000 MkIII's 17,712 examples. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.