Japan vs Germany — 1967 vs 1969
| Cosmo Sport 110S (L10A) | 2800 CS E9 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 110 hp | 170 hp |
| Torque | 96 lb-ft | 179 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 982 cc | 2,788 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 10.2 sec | 8.8 sec |
| Top Speed | 115 mph | 127 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 17.5 sec | 16.5 sec |
| Weight | 2,072 lbs | 2,976 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,200 mm | 2,626 mm |
| Length | 4,140 mm | 4,650 mm |
| Units Produced | 1,519 | 9,399 |
| Value (Excellent) | $350,000 | $85,000 |
| Collectibility | 9/10 | 9/10 |
| Rarity | 9/10 | 7/10 |
The 1969 BMW 2800 CS E9 emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1967 Mazda Cosmo Sport 110S (L10A) counters with lighter weight, greater rarity, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
Putting the 1967 Mazda Cosmo Sport 110S (L10A) against the 1969 BMW 2800 CS E9 is a comparison that enthusiasts have debated for decades. Each car reflects distinct design philosophies shaped by different automotive cultures — Japan versus Germany. The 1969 BMW 2800 CS E9 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 170 hp compared to 110 hp, a 60-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mazda Cosmo Sport uses a Twin-Rotor Wankel 10A displacing 982 cc, while the BMW 2800 CS relies on a Inline-6 SOHC with 2,788 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1969 BMW 2800 CS E9 edges ahead at 8.8 seconds versus 10.2 seconds. The Mazda Cosmo Sport carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 904 lbs lighter. Rarity plays a significant role here — with only 1,519 units built, the 1967 Mazda Cosmo Sport 110S (L10A) is considerably scarcer than the BMW 2800 CS's 9,399 examples. On the collector market, the 1967 Mazda Cosmo Sport 110S (L10A) commands a significant premium over the 1969 BMW 2800 CS E9, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.