Holden LJ Torana GTR XU-1

vs

Nissan Skyline

Australia vs Japan — 1972 vs 1972

Holden LJ Torana GTR XU-1 (1972)
Nissan Skyline (1972)
Specifications
LJ Torana GTR XU-1 BathurstSkyline 2000 GT-R KPGC110 (Kenmeri)
Horsepower186 hp160 hp
Torque207 lb-ft131 lb-ft
Engine Size3,310 cc1,989 cc
0-60 mph8.0 sec8.2 sec
Top Speed124 mph121 mph
¼ Mile15.8 sec16.1 sec
Weight2,348 lbs2,491 lbs
Wheelbase2,540 mm2,610 mm
Length4,330 mm4,460 mm
Units Produced197
Value (Excellent)$350,000$500,000
Collectibility9/1010/10
Rarity8/1010/10
The Verdict

On balance, the 1972 Holden LJ Torana GTR XU-1 Bathurst makes a stronger case on paper with more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. However, the 1972 Nissan Skyline 2000 GT-R KPGC110 (Kenmeri) counters with stronger collectibility, and its appeal extends beyond mere numbers. Choose the 1972 Holden LJ Torana GTR XU-1 Bathurst for outright capability, or the 1972 Nissan Skyline 2000 GT-R KPGC110 (Kenmeri) for a more distinctive ownership experience.

Overview

The rivalry between Australia and Japan automotive industries has produced legendary matchups, and the 1972 Holden LJ Torana GTR XU-1 Bathurst versus 1972 Nissan Skyline 2000 GT-R KPGC110 (Kenmeri) is among the most fascinating. These two cars represent the best of their national engineering schools. The 1972 Holden LJ Torana GTR XU-1 Bathurst holds a clear advantage in raw power with 186 hp compared to 160 hp, a 26-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Holden LJ Torana GTR XU-1 uses a Inline-6 OHV displacing 3,310 cc, while the Nissan Skyline relies on a Inline-6 DOHC with 1,989 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1972 Holden LJ Torana GTR XU-1 Bathurst edges ahead at 8.0 seconds versus 8.2 seconds. Each of these machines offers a unique window into the era that produced it, making both worthy of consideration by collectors and drivers alike.