Mazda RX-7

vs

Chrysler Crossfire

Japan vs USA — 1992 vs 2005

Mazda RX-7 (1992)
Chrysler Crossfire (2005)
Specifications
RX-7 FD3S Twin TurboCrossfire SRT-6
Horsepower255 hp330 hp
Torque217 lb-ft310 lb-ft
Engine Size1,308 cc3,199 cc
0-60 mph5.0 sec5.0 sec
Top Speed155 mph157 mph
¼ Mile13.7 sec13.5 sec
Weight2,888 lbs3,271 lbs
Wheelbase2,425 mm2,400 mm
Length4,285 mm4,060 mm
Units Produced68,589—
Original MSRP$31,300$44,375
Value (Excellent)$90,000$30,000
Collectibility9/105/10
Rarity7/106/10
The Verdict

The 2005 Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1992 Mazda RX-7 FD3S Twin Turbo counters with lighter weight, stronger collectibility, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.

Overview

When Japan engineering meets USA craftsmanship, the result is one of the most compelling matchups in the classic car world. The 1992 Mazda RX-7 FD3S Twin Turbo and 2005 Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 embody their respective national automotive traditions while competing in the same arena. The 2005 Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 330 hp compared to 255 hp, a 75-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mazda RX-7 uses a Twin-Rotor Wankel 13B-REW Twin Turbo displacing 1,308 cc, while the Chrysler Crossfire relies on a V6 SOHC Supercharged with 3,199 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2005 Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 edges ahead at 5.0 seconds versus 5.0 seconds. The Mazda RX-7 carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 383 lbs lighter. On the collector market, the 1992 Mazda RX-7 FD3S Twin Turbo commands a significant premium over the 2005 Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1992 Mazda RX-7 FD3S Twin Turbo rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.