Australia vs USA — 2006 vs 2016
| Commodore HSV GTS-R W1 | Camaro ZL1 1LE | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 636 hp | 650 hp |
| Torque | 601 lb-ft | 650 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 6,162 cc | 6,162 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9 sec | 3.4 sec |
| Top Speed | 193 mph | 198 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 11.9 sec | 11.4 sec |
| Wheelbase | 2,915 mm | 2,811 mm |
| Length | 4,936 mm | 4,784 mm |
| Units Produced | 300 | — |
| Value (Excellent) | $250,000 | $85,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Rarity | 9/10 | 5/10 |
The 2016 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 1LE emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering quicker acceleration, higher top speed, better value. The 2006 Holden Commodore HSV GTS-R W1 counters with its unique character, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
Putting the 2006 Holden Commodore HSV GTS-R W1 against the 2016 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 1LE is a comparison that enthusiasts have debated for decades. Each car reflects distinct design philosophies shaped by different automotive cultures — Australia versus USA. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 2006 Holden Commodore HSV GTS-R W1 producing 636 hp and the 2016 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 1LE delivering 650 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Holden Commodore uses a V8 Supercharged OHV 16V displacing 6,162 cc, while the Chevrolet Camaro relies on a V8 OHV 16V Supercharged with 6,162 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2016 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 1LE edges ahead at 3.4 seconds versus 3.9 seconds. On the collector market, the 2006 Holden Commodore HSV GTS-R W1 commands a significant premium over the 2016 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 1LE, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.