UK vs United Kingdom — 1962 vs 1967
| 3000 Mk III BJ8 | 3000 MkIII Phase 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 150 hp | 150 hp |
| Torque | 170 lb-ft | 178 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 2,912 cc | 2,912 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 9.8 sec | 9.8 sec |
| Top Speed | 121 mph | 120 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 17.1 sec | 17.3 sec |
| Weight | — | 2,509 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,337 mm | 2,337 mm |
| Length | 4,013 mm | 3,962 mm |
| Units Produced | 17,712 | 17,712 |
| Original MSRP | — | $3,595 |
| Value (Excellent) | $130,000 | $95,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 9/10 |
| Rarity | 6/10 | 7/10 |
This matchup is remarkably close. The 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III BJ8 offers higher top speed, while the 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 MkIII Phase 2 counters with quicker acceleration, stronger collectibility. Neither holds a decisive advantage, making this a true enthusiast's dilemma. Your choice ultimately depends on which driving philosophy resonates more with you.
The Austin-Healey 3000 lineage tells a fascinating story of automotive evolution. Comparing the 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III BJ8 with the 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 MkIII Phase 2 reveals how Austin-Healey refined and reimagined one of its most important nameplates over the years. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1962 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III BJ8 producing 150 hp and the 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 MkIII Phase 2 delivering 150 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Austin-Healey 3000 uses a Inline-6 OHV 12V displacing 2,912 cc, while the Austin-Healey 3000 MkIII relies on a Inline-6 OHV with 2,912 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 MkIII Phase 2 edges ahead at 9.8 seconds versus 9.8 seconds. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 MkIII Phase 2 rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.