Germany vs Germany — 1980 vs 2010
| Quattro Ur-Quattro (20V Turbo) | RS 6 Avant C7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 220 hp | 560 hp |
| Torque | 228 lb-ft | 516 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 2,226 cc | 3,993 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9 sec | 3.7 sec |
| Top Speed | 143 mph | 190 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 14.3 sec | 11.5 sec |
| Weight | 2,976 lbs | — |
| Wheelbase | 2,524 mm | 2,915 mm |
| Length | 4,404 mm | 4,979 mm |
| Units Produced | 11,452 | — |
| Original MSRP | $35,950 | — |
| Value (Excellent) | $150,000 | $110,000 |
| Collectibility | 8/10 | 5/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 5/10 |
The 2010 Audi RS 6 Avant C7 emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1980 Audi Quattro Ur-Quattro (20V Turbo) counters with stronger collectibility, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
The 1980 Audi Quattro Ur-Quattro (20V Turbo) and 2010 Audi RS 6 Avant C7 share a manufacturer in Audi, but that's where the similarities get interesting. These two models reveal the versatility and ambition of the Audi brand. The 2010 Audi RS 6 Avant C7 holds a clear advantage in raw power with 560 hp compared to 220 hp, a 340-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Audi Quattro uses a Inline-5 Turbo 20V (RR) displacing 2,226 cc, while the Audi RS 6 Avant relies on a V8 DOHC 32V Twin-Turbo with 3,993 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2010 Audi RS 6 Avant C7 edges ahead at 3.7 seconds versus 5.9 seconds. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1980 Audi Quattro Ur-Quattro (20V Turbo) rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.