Japan vs Japan — 1992 vs 2003
| Lancer Evolution Evolution III (CE9A) | Lancer Evolution VIII MR (CT9A) | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 270 hp | 280 hp |
| Torque | 228 lb-ft | 295 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,997 cc | 1,997 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0 sec | 4.3 sec |
| Top Speed | 149 mph | 155 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.5 sec | 13.0 sec |
| Weight | — | 3,086 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,510 mm | 2,625 mm |
| Length | 4,310 mm | 4,490 mm |
| Units Produced | 5,000 | — |
| Original MSRP | — | $33,000 |
| Value (Excellent) | $75,000 | $55,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 8/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 6/10 |
The 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII MR (CT9A) emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering quicker acceleration, higher top speed, stronger collectibility. The 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution III (CE9A) counters with its unique character, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
Tracing the evolution of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution from 1992 to 2003 offers a compelling look at how automotive design and engineering progressed. These two variants showcase the changing face of Mitsubishi. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution III (CE9A) producing 270 hp and the 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII MR (CT9A) delivering 280 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution uses a Inline-4 DOHC 16V Turbocharged displacing 1,997 cc, while the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution relies on a Inline-4 DOHC 16V MIVEC Turbocharged with 1,997 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII MR (CT9A) edges ahead at 4.3 seconds versus 5.0 seconds. From a collectibility standpoint, the 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII MR (CT9A) rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.