Sweden vs Sweden — 1966 vs 2003
| 142/144/145 142 S | S60 R AWD | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 118 hp | 300 hp |
| Torque | 125 lb-ft | 295 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,986 cc | 2,521 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 12.5 sec | 5.4 sec |
| Top Speed | 106 mph | 155 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 18.5 sec | 13.8 sec |
| Weight | — | 3,589 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,600 mm | 2,715 mm |
| Length | 4,581 mm | 4,575 mm |
| Units Produced | — | 15,000 |
| Original MSRP | — | $37,350 |
| Value (Excellent) | $22,000 | $25,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Rarity | 3/10 | 6/10 |
The 2003 Volvo S60 R AWD emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. The 1966 Volvo 142/144/145 142 S counters with its unique character, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
The 1966 Volvo 142/144/145 142 S and 2003 Volvo S60 R AWD share a manufacturer in Volvo, but that's where the similarities get interesting. These two models reveal the versatility and ambition of the Volvo brand. The 2003 Volvo S60 R AWD holds a clear advantage in raw power with 300 hp compared to 118 hp, a 182-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Volvo 142/144/145 uses a Inline-4 OHV displacing 1,986 cc, while the Volvo S60 relies on a Inline-5 Turbocharged with 2,521 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2003 Volvo S60 R AWD edges ahead at 5.4 seconds versus 12.5 seconds. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.