Japan vs Japan — 1992 vs 1996
| Lancer Evolution Evolution III (CE9A) | Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 270 hp | 280 hp |
| Torque | 228 lb-ft | 260 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,997 cc | 1,997 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0 sec | 4.7 sec |
| Top Speed | 149 mph | 152 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.5 sec | 13.3 sec |
| Weight | — | 2,778 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,510 mm | 2,510 mm |
| Length | 4,310 mm | 4,330 mm |
| Units Produced | 5,000 | — |
| Value (Excellent) | $75,000 | $85,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 8/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 8/10 |
Numbers favor the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A with quicker acceleration, higher top speed, stronger collectibility. The 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution III (CE9A) offers its unique character, and has its own devoted following. For those who let their heart decide, either car delivers a rewarding ownership experience.
Few model names carry as much weight as the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution. The 1992 and 1996 iterations represent different chapters in this storied nameplate's history, each reflecting the priorities and technologies of its era. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution III (CE9A) producing 270 hp and the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A delivering 280 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution uses a Inline-4 DOHC 16V Turbocharged displacing 1,997 cc, while the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution relies on a Inline-4 DOHC 16-valve turbo (4G63T) with 1,997 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A edges ahead at 4.7 seconds versus 5.0 seconds. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.