USA vs USA — 1964 vs 1967
| Comet Cyclone CJ 428 | Chevelle SS 396 L35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 335 hp | 325 hp |
| Torque | 440 lb-ft | 425 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 7,014 cc | 6,489 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2 sec | 6.5 sec |
| Top Speed | 130 mph | 124 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 14.1 sec | 14.8 sec |
| Weight | 3,502 lbs | 3,400 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,921 mm | 2,921 mm |
| Length | 5,131 mm | 5,055 mm |
| Units Produced | — | 63,006 |
| Original MSRP | $3,224 | $2,825 |
| Value (Excellent) | $85,000 | $95,000 |
| Collectibility | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 6/10 |
The 1964 Mercury Comet Cyclone CJ 428 holds an edge across most measurable criteria, offering quicker acceleration, higher top speed, better value. That said, the 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle SS 396 L35 brings stronger collectibility and remains a compelling choice for enthusiasts who value Chevrolet heritage. The right pick depends on whether you prioritize specifications or the intangible qualities that make a car truly special.
Among Muscle Car enthusiasts, the matchup between the 1964 Mercury Comet Cyclone CJ 428 and 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle SS 396 L35 is one for the ages. These Muscle era machines competed directly for buyers' attention and continue to vie for collectors' affections today. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1964 Mercury Comet Cyclone CJ 428 producing 335 hp and the 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle SS 396 L35 delivering 325 hp. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1964 Mercury Comet Cyclone CJ 428 edges ahead at 6.2 seconds versus 6.5 seconds. Whether you prioritize driving dynamics, heritage, or aesthetic appeal, both contenders make a strong case for themselves.