UK vs USA — 2013 vs 2016
| XFR-S 5.0 Supercharged | ATS-V Twin-Turbo V6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 542 hp | 464 hp |
| Torque | 502 lb-ft | 445 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 5,000 cc | 3,564 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4 sec | 3.8 sec |
| Top Speed | 186 mph | 189 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 12.6 sec | 12.0 sec |
| Weight | 4,174 lbs | 3,769 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,909 mm | 2,775 mm |
| Length | 4,966 mm | 4,680 mm |
| Units Produced | 500 | — |
| Original MSRP | $99,000 | $61,460 |
| Value (Excellent) | $70,000 | $55,000 |
| Collectibility | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 5/10 |
The 2016 Cadillac ATS-V Twin-Turbo V6 emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering quicker acceleration, higher top speed, lighter weight. The 2013 Jaguar XFR-S 5.0 Supercharged counters with more power, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.
Putting the 2013 Jaguar XFR-S 5.0 Supercharged against the 2016 Cadillac ATS-V Twin-Turbo V6 is a comparison that enthusiasts have debated for decades. Each car reflects distinct design philosophies shaped by different automotive cultures — UK versus USA. The 2013 Jaguar XFR-S 5.0 Supercharged holds a clear advantage in raw power with 542 hp compared to 464 hp, a 78-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Jaguar XFR-S uses a V8 DOHC Supercharged displacing 5,000 cc, while the Cadillac ATS-V relies on a V6 DOHC Twin-Turbo (LF4) with 3,564 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2016 Cadillac ATS-V Twin-Turbo V6 edges ahead at 3.8 seconds versus 4.4 seconds. The Cadillac ATS-V carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 405 lbs lighter. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.