Japan vs Japan — 1996 vs 1992
| Lancer Evolution VI Tommi Mäkinen Edition | Lancer Evolution Evolution III (CE9A) | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 280 hp | 270 hp |
| Torque | 275 lb-ft | 228 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,997 cc | 1,997 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4 sec | 5.0 sec |
| Top Speed | 155 mph | 149 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 12.8 sec | 13.5 sec |
| Wheelbase | 2,510 mm | 2,510 mm |
| Length | 4,350 mm | 4,310 mm |
| Units Produced | 2,500 | 5,000 |
| Value (Excellent) | $90,000 | $75,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Rarity | 7/10 | 7/10 |
On balance, the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI Tommi Mäkinen Edition makes a stronger case on paper with quicker acceleration, higher top speed. However, the 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution III (CE9A) counters with its own distinct appeal, and its appeal extends beyond mere numbers. Choose the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI Tommi Mäkinen Edition for outright capability, or the 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution III (CE9A) for a more distinctive ownership experience.
Few model names carry as much weight as the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution. The 1996 and 1992 iterations represent different chapters in this storied nameplate's history, each reflecting the priorities and technologies of its era. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI Tommi Mäkinen Edition producing 280 hp and the 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution III (CE9A) delivering 270 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution uses a Inline-4 Turbo DOHC 16V displacing 1,997 cc, while the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution relies on a Inline-4 DOHC 16V Turbocharged with 1,997 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI Tommi Mäkinen Edition edges ahead at 4.4 seconds versus 5.0 seconds. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.