USA vs USA — 1982 vs 2016
| Camaro IROC-Z | Camaro ZL1 1LE | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 245 hp | 650 hp |
| Torque | 345 lb-ft | 650 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 5,736 cc | 6,162 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2 sec | 3.4 sec |
| Top Speed | 140 mph | 198 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 14.5 sec | 11.4 sec |
| Weight | 3,350 lbs | — |
| Wheelbase | 2,565 mm | 2,811 mm |
| Length | 4,927 mm | 4,784 mm |
| Original MSRP | $14,675 | — |
| Value (Excellent) | $25,000 | $85,000 |
| Collectibility | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Rarity | 3/10 | 5/10 |
This matchup is remarkably close. The 1982 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z offers stronger collectibility, better value, while the 2016 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 1LE counters with more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. Neither holds a decisive advantage, making this a true enthusiast's dilemma. Your choice ultimately depends on which driving philosophy resonates more with you.
The Chevrolet Camaro lineage tells a fascinating story of automotive evolution. Comparing the 1982 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z with the 2016 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 1LE reveals how Chevrolet refined and reimagined one of its most important nameplates over the years. The 2016 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 1LE holds a clear advantage in raw power with 650 hp compared to 245 hp, a 405-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Chevrolet Camaro uses a V8 OHV (L98 TPI small-block) displacing 5,736 cc, while the Chevrolet Camaro relies on a V8 OHV 16V Supercharged with 6,162 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2016 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 1LE edges ahead at 3.4 seconds versus 6.2 seconds. On the collector market, the 2016 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 1LE commands a significant premium over the 1982 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity.