Japan vs Japan — 1996 vs 1997
| Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A | Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 280 hp | 280 hp |
| Torque | 260 lb-ft | 268 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,997 cc | 1,997 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7 sec | 4.7 sec |
| Top Speed | 152 mph | 152 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.3 sec | 13.5 sec |
| Weight | 2,778 lbs | 2,976 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,510 mm | 2,510 mm |
| Length | 4,330 mm | 4,350 mm |
| Units Produced | — | 6,600 |
| Value (Excellent) | $85,000 | $95,000 |
| Collectibility | 8/10 | 9/10 |
| Rarity | 8/10 | 8/10 |
Two outstanding machines, each with compelling strengths. The 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A excels in lighter weight, while the 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A stands out for quicker acceleration, stronger collectibility. The best advice? Drive both if you can, then follow your instincts.
Tracing the evolution of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution from 1996 to 1997 offers a compelling look at how automotive design and engineering progressed. These two variants showcase the changing face of Mitsubishi. On paper, the two are remarkably close in power output, with the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A producing 280 hp and the 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A delivering 280 hp. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution uses a Inline-4 DOHC 16-valve turbo (4G63T) displacing 1,997 cc, while the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution relies on a Inline-4 DOHC Turbo with 1,997 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A edges ahead at 4.7 seconds versus 4.7 seconds. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.