Japan vs Japan — 1996 vs 1992
| Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A | Lancer Evolution I (CD9A) | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 280 hp | 250 hp |
| Torque | 260 lb-ft | 228 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,997 cc | 1,997 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7 sec | 5.3 sec |
| Top Speed | 152 mph | 143 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.3 sec | 14.0 sec |
| Weight | 2,778 lbs | 2,579 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,510 mm | 2,500 mm |
| Length | 4,330 mm | 4,310 mm |
| Units Produced | — | 5,000 |
| Value (Excellent) | $85,000 | $65,000 |
| Collectibility | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Rarity | 8/10 | 7/10 |
On balance, the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A makes a stronger case on paper with more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. However, the 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution I (CD9A) counters with lighter weight, and its appeal extends beyond mere numbers. Choose the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A for outright capability, or the 1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution I (CD9A) for a more distinctive ownership experience.
Few model names carry as much weight as the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution. The 1996 and 1992 iterations represent different chapters in this storied nameplate's history, each reflecting the priorities and technologies of its era. The 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A holds a clear advantage in raw power with 280 hp compared to 250 hp, a 30-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution uses a Inline-4 DOHC 16-valve turbo (4G63T) displacing 1,997 cc, while the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution relies on a Inline-4 DOHC 16V Turbocharged with 1,997 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Evolution IV CN9A edges ahead at 4.7 seconds versus 5.3 seconds. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.