Sweden vs Sweden — 2003 vs 1982
| S60 R AWD | 780 Bertone Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 300 hp | 182 hp |
| Torque | 295 lb-ft | 214 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 2,521 cc | 2,316 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4 sec | 8.5 sec |
| Top Speed | 155 mph | 130 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.8 sec | 16.5 sec |
| Weight | 3,589 lbs | 3,076 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,715 mm | 2,770 mm |
| Length | 4,575 mm | 4,785 mm |
| Units Produced | 15,000 | 8,518 |
| Original MSRP | $37,350 | $29,950 |
| Value (Excellent) | $25,000 | $25,000 |
| Collectibility | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Rarity | 6/10 | 7/10 |
The 2003 Volvo S60 R AWD holds an edge across most measurable criteria, offering more power, quicker acceleration, higher top speed. That said, the 1982 Volvo 780 Bertone Turbo brings lighter weight and remains a compelling choice for enthusiasts who value Volvo heritage. The right pick depends on whether you prioritize specifications or the intangible qualities that make a car truly special.
The 2003 Volvo S60 R AWD and 1982 Volvo 780 Bertone Turbo share a manufacturer in Volvo, but that's where the similarities get interesting. These two models reveal the versatility and ambition of the Volvo brand. The 2003 Volvo S60 R AWD holds a clear advantage in raw power with 300 hp compared to 182 hp, a 118-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Volvo S60 uses a Inline-5 Turbocharged displacing 2,521 cc, while the Volvo 780 relies on a Inline-4 Turbo SOHC with 2,316 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 2003 Volvo S60 R AWD edges ahead at 5.4 seconds versus 8.5 seconds. The Volvo 780 carries a weight advantage, tipping the scales 513 lbs lighter. Both trade at comparable values on the collector market, making the choice between them largely one of personal preference.