Mitsubishi FTO

vs

BMW M3

Japan vs Germany — 1994 vs 1988

Mitsubishi FTO (1994)
BMW M3 (1988)
Specifications
FTO GPX MivecM3 E30 Evolution II
Horsepower200 hp220 hp
Torque148 lb-ft181 lb-ft
Engine Size1,998 cc2,467 cc
0-60 mph6.5 sec6.1 sec
Top Speed143 mph152 mph
¼ Mile15.0 sec14.5 sec
Weight2,579 lbs2,646 lbs
Wheelbase2,500 mm2,565 mm
Length4,320 mm4,345 mm
Units Produced65,000500
Original MSRP—$45,000
Value (Excellent)$22,000$250,000
Collectibility7/1010/10
Rarity7/1010/10
The Verdict

The 1988 BMW M3 E30 Evolution II emerges ahead in most objective measures, offering quicker acceleration, higher top speed, greater rarity. The 1994 Mitsubishi FTO GPX Mivec counters with better value, but the numbers favor its rival. Still, both are remarkable machines, and the final choice often comes down to which driving experience speaks to you.

Overview

Putting the 1994 Mitsubishi FTO GPX Mivec against the 1988 BMW M3 E30 Evolution II is a comparison that enthusiasts have debated for decades. Each car reflects distinct design philosophies shaped by different automotive cultures — Japan versus Germany. The 1988 BMW M3 E30 Evolution II holds a clear advantage in raw power with 220 hp compared to 200 hp, a 20-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mitsubishi FTO uses a V6 DOHC MIVEC displacing 1,998 cc, while the BMW M3 relies on a Inline-4 DOHC 16V with 2,467 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1988 BMW M3 E30 Evolution II edges ahead at 6.1 seconds versus 6.5 seconds. Rarity plays a significant role here — with only 500 units built, the 1988 BMW M3 E30 Evolution II is considerably scarcer than the Mitsubishi FTO's 65,000 examples. On the collector market, the 1988 BMW M3 E30 Evolution II commands a significant premium over the 1994 Mitsubishi FTO GPX Mivec, reflecting differences in prestige and rarity. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1988 BMW M3 E30 Evolution II rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.