Japan vs Japan — 1992 vs 1992
| RX-7 Type RS (FD3S) | RX-7 Type R FD3S | |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 280 hp | 255 hp |
| Torque | 232 lb-ft | 217 lb-ft |
| Engine Size | 1,308 cc | 1,308 cc |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8 sec | 4.9 sec |
| Top Speed | 158 mph | 155 mph |
| ¼ Mile | 13.5 sec | 13.4 sec |
| Weight | — | 2,778 lbs |
| Wheelbase | 2,425 mm | 2,425 mm |
| Length | 4,295 mm | 4,295 mm |
| Value (Excellent) | $90,000 | $120,000 |
| Collectibility | 5/10 | 9/10 |
| Rarity | 6/10 | 8/10 |
This matchup is remarkably close. The 1992 Mazda RX-7 Type RS (FD3S) offers quicker acceleration, higher top speed, while the 1992 Mazda RX-7 Type R FD3S counters with stronger collectibility. Neither holds a decisive advantage, making this a true enthusiast's dilemma. Your choice ultimately depends on which driving philosophy resonates more with you.
The Mazda RX-7 lineage tells a fascinating story of automotive evolution. Comparing the 1992 Mazda RX-7 Type RS (FD3S) with the 1992 Mazda RX-7 Type R FD3S reveals how Mazda refined and reimagined one of its most important nameplates over the years. The 1992 Mazda RX-7 Type RS (FD3S) holds a clear advantage in raw power with 280 hp compared to 255 hp, a 25-horsepower difference that shapes the driving experience. Under the hood, the contrast is notable: the Mazda RX-7 uses a Twin-Rotor Twin-Turbo (Wankel) displacing 1,308 cc, while the Mazda RX-7 relies on a Rotary Twin Turbo (13B-REW) with 1,308 cc. In the sprint to 60 mph, the 1992 Mazda RX-7 Type RS (FD3S) edges ahead at 4.8 seconds versus 4.9 seconds. From a collectibility standpoint, the 1992 Mazda RX-7 Type R FD3S rates higher among enthusiasts and auction houses.